Classical Film Reviews · Film Reviews

Classical Review: Holiday [1938]

Lovely Johnny Case (we’re being conditioned to like men called ‘Johnny’) has the most peculiar fashion of dealing with nerves- he flips! Unsurprising really as he’s played by the equally-lovely, Cary Grant- who ran away to join the circus aged 14. No, he really did! He was born in Bristol (England), was abandoned by his parents and went on to play gentleman bachelors in Hollywood romantic comedies. In fact, Ian Fleming modeled James Bond with a mind to Grant playing him in any future films…

Grant never played a villain. In this film he is a young man who falls head over heels in love with a girl he’s only just met. Of course, having asked her to marry him (after just ten days!) now he has to meet the family… and he’s in for a surprise.

Julia Seaton’s father is traditional, a banker and expects her future husband to follow him in the business. Her siblings are a little different however… oddball Katherine Hepburn is eccentric sister Linda- on a quest to find her place in the world- and poor brother Ned… has his own problems;

Did you note the beautiful scenery on display? Well, it makes poor Johnny awfully nervous as he really had no idea what he’s intending to marry into! Kind hearted Linda welcomes Johnny into the family and supports his dream to spend his early years on ‘holiday’, finding himself and discovering the world before he settles down to work. (No one took a Gap Year before university in those days!)

The eponymous ‘Holiday’ of Johnny’s dreams is the key plot point, dividing the characters in opinion.

Katharine Hepburn understudied the role of Linda Seaton in the original play on Broadway in the late 20s. She performed a scene from ‘Holiday’ for her first screen test and then became a star… who appeared in the film adaptation! Linda Seaton was loosely based on a former debutante who left high society to hunt wild animals in Africa! Katharine Hepburn is the perfect actress to portray her. She loved to defy convention; wearing men’s clothes because they were far more comfortable and practical. When the studio’s costume department hid her trousers in the early 1930s she walked around in her underwear instead! The third of four films pairing Cary Grant and Katharine Hepburn. They both were known for doing a lot of their own stunts Hepburn because she didn’t believe her double had correct deportment.

The film is a classic ‘screwball comedy’- that beautiful, wry humour teamed with farce that we now associate with French comedies. Johnny and Linda are delightfully whimsical. I suppose I like them so much because we share a similar world view- that life in inherently amusing.

Unfortunately Julia doesn’t have quite the same sensibility… So what should Johnny do? Follow his dreams or settle down for the girl he loves?

Film Reviews · New Film Reviews

Imagine Me & You: A Rare Lesbian Film

As everyone who watches my film reviews knows… I am a big fan of a happy ending and a sucker for happiness in general. Unsurprisingly, my favourite (and much loved) lesbian film is therefore Imagine Me & You. Here is that rare thing: a lesbian film, without unnecessary angst, that is actually charming and cheering to watch.

We open in picture-perfect London on the day of Rach’s wedding to her longtime boyfriend and best friend Heck (played by Piper Perabo and Matthew Goode). Everyone is there; friends, family and even the wedding’s florist Luce (played by Lena Headey). By the end of the reception, Luce has been taken up by Rach’s family, particularly her baby sister, and is becoming fast friends with the bride herself…

And thus we begin a rather-sweet romcom love triangle as Rachel quickly falls for the openly gay Luce. It’s a classic set up, minus the tired and unrealistic ‘comical’ misunderstandings but plus one of the rarest things- a central gay relationship that is positively presented. Despite the relationship starting with one of the women already being married to a man! The ‘already married issue’ is resolved incredibly quickly despite it being the main tension in the film. Interestingly most people involved seem perfectly okay with Rach falling in love with someone else, and leaving her marriage because that ‘someone’ is a girl.

I’m sure we could read very deeply into this, perhaps write some essays about masculinity and how two women being together seems to be considered as sexy in a humorous way. It’s an abstract (Cooper’s jokes and Rach’s mishaps with the porn video) but sweet and unsexed when it’s up close: “[Love] is all that matters”… It doesn’t necessarily respect the same sex relationship since it’s unlikely these characters would react in such a way were it a man Rach was running off with. However: I do think that this doesn’t have to stand in the way of enjoying the film.

Yes, the drama isn’t heart wrenching and, yes, the characters are a little too lovely but it’s a solid British romcom in the Love Actually vein. It’s sweet, it’s bland, it’s heartwarming, and that’s why, to me, it’s one of the best lesbian films of all time.

Here is a lesbian film about a life I want to lead, a wholly realistic one that I identify strongly with. Yes, certain characters are shocked when Rach comes out (mainly her mother, played by the fabulous Celia Imrie) but no one is at any point openly homophobic. Darren Boyd, as Heck’s friend Cooper, makes all of the cringy, sexist, but not intentionally rude, remarks about lesbians that we’ve all heard a hundred times. But he is only angry at his best friend being hurt by someone else entering the marriage, not because that someone is a woman.

No one dies, no one commits suicide, no one self harms, or tries to shoot someone- like the majority of lesbian films (ie. cliché central). There are also no titillating lesbian scenes clearly created for the pleasure of anyone but lesbians.

The film was written and directed by Ol Parker, also known for The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, about old-age Britishness being shipped to India, and this film too comes straight from the Richard Curtis school of positivity and charm.

Not everyone experiences being gay and coming out as a big trauma, which- lets me honest- both indie films and Hollywood seem to want us to believe. It’s nice to know that there are films out there that show the other side. This is a nice film about two nice girls who meet and fall in love with a little narrative complication that is easily resolved. There are thousands of nice, happy films about straight couples- don’t lesbians deserve one too?

Classical Film Reviews · Film Reviews

It’s A Wonderful Life is my all time favourite Christmas film!

Although it isn’t strictly a Christmas film now, is it? The film begins and ends on Christmas Eve but mainly it is a straight dramatic retelling of the life of George Bailey. Poor George keeps trying to get out of his small town of Bedford Falls but is pulled back time and time again for various reasons… most of them having to do with Henry F Potter, the richest man in town.

The film chronicles George’s life from childhood, graduating from Bedford Falls High School, and his many battles with Potter, as he tries to take over George’s family-owned bank, the Bailey Building and Loan. James Stewart was nominated for the Best Actor in a Leading Role Oscar for playing George and he manages to bring both gravitas and light to a role that could have become too dark.

Although director Frank Capra and stars Stewart and Donna Reed have collective filmographies that consist of a couple of hundred films, they all cite It’s a Wonderful Life as their favourite. Capra even took this one step further in his autobiography, writing: “I thought it was the greatest film I ever made. Better yet, I thought it was the greatest film anybody ever made.”

… which, is a pretty big claim but it’s great he’s so self assured. Good for you, Frank!

However, in its initial run the film lost money- largely because Capra, who trained as an engineer before becoming a director, went over budget, even going so far as to engineer a new type of artificial snow for the film. At the time, painted cornflakes were the most common form of fake snow, but they posed an audio problem for Capra (due to crunching rather loudly under the actors’ feet!). Capra refused to dub the snow scenes and so opted to mix foamite (found in fire extinguishers) with sugar and water, to create a less noisy option.

The film also lost out for being, in many people’s eyes, a peculiarly downbeat way of celebrating the festive season, what with depression and suicide being a rather major plot-point!

It is perhaps for this reason that many publishers originally rejected The Greatest Gift, the short story the film is based upon. Its author Philip Van Doren Stern eventually decided to give the gift of words to his closest friends for Christmas. He printed 200 copies of the story and sent it out as a 21 page Christmas card. A producer at RKO Pictures ended up in possession of one and bought the movie rights for $10,000.

After many years of television screenings, particularly at Christmas, the film has slowly become a cinematic Holiday tradition and is now one of the most beloved films of all time. It’s certainly one of my favourites and is an outstanding film, underrated for its great narrative quality- which, yes, can be obscured by ‘the message’, the sentiment, and the schmaltz.

Possibly the film resonates with viewers thanks to its close narrative ties to another great Christmas classic that has long lived in the collective consciousness: Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol. The relationship between the two stories is both close and yet not entirely straightforward…

It’s A Wonderful Life is not an American version, nor adaptation, nor sequel.

Yet, it echoes Dickens’ story in many ways: Both set on Christmas Eve, both about business men with finance playing a key role, both involve supernatural intervention which gives a man a chance to witness an alternate reality of his own life which then goes on to cause him to reevaluate his life and future behaviour. Both stories also establish a tension between on the one hand, Christmas and Christian charity, and on the other unchecked capitalism. They both drive home an essentially Christian message: how do our choices affect others and do we make a difference in the world?

However, the original story, The Greatest Gift, bears much less resemblance to A Christmas Carol so perhaps there was a little movie-making-magic (slash tinkering of an economically beneficial kind) going on behind the scenes here…

Whilst A Christmas Carol is about a man so wicked (read: clinically depressed) he actively allows life to pass him by, George is a good, ambitious man but so busy helping others he feels as if life has passed him by. Despondent (read: clinically depressed), he wishes he had never been born and sees how awful the world would be without him- a realization Ebenezer Scrooge has thrust upon him. These two men are not the same in any way. George is a positive and admirable figure no matter how much money he has.

So, a short rebuttal to some obstinate criticisms of the schmaltzy ending: it’s Christmas. No one needs a film with Christmas ending in suicide. George talks to an angel. Thus this is not the film for crushing realism.